Tag: constitution
Just one day….to protect and serve and rob and kill and lie.
The following is the news items the national police misconduct site, Injustice Everywhere, found on one day. Obviously it does not include the many cases they didn’t find or that went unreported, the myriad cases of harassment of ordinary people doing ordinary stuff and being told they are breaking laws that don’t exist. You know, those terrorist types who like to assert their rights, take photos, demonstrate and other such outrageous acts of pure villainy.
Yes I know there are good cops, some of whom may even expose their piece of scum colleagues. But those good cops who keep their mouths shut for their own convenience and allow their criminal colleagues to carry on being scum are no better than those officers they protect.
We will see who the good ones are when the crunch comes. Will they refuse to take your guns? Will they refuse to take you off for forced vaccination? Will they refuse to force you into FEMA camps after the next false flag attack or big weather event. Or will they just keep their mouths shut for their own sake and go along with their sick in the head colleagues?
They all swore an oath, let us hope that they remember it..
1. Hockley County TX – A Hockley Sheriff’s Department chief deputy and a narcotics officer were both arrested during a federal methamphetamine raid operation on allegations that they were part of a large drug trafficking ring.
20. Slaton TX – A Slaton police officer has been charged with theft for failing to disclose $200 that he confiscated during a drug sting operation.
23. Virginia Beach VA – A “master” police officer who is also a member of the DUI special operations task force now faces hit & run chargesa in addition to an existing DUI charge he already faced over the same accident.
24. Webbers Falls OK – 2 police officers may face grand larceny charges after they ordered a woman to pay them $220 or face arrest for a type of warrant they couldn’t arrest her for at a drivers license checkpoint.
27. New Orleans LA – NOPD officers may be implicated by new evidence and a video taken by police volunteering from Pennsylvania as FBI continues probe into Hurricane Katrina murder case and subsequent cover up.
28. Mount Holly NJ – A police K9 officer is investigated by the New Jersey SPCA after his explosives sniffing police dog died from being left inside a hot vehicle.
What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.
Lawful Rebellion.
Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?
Rebellion in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close to another word that seems to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution. Defined meaning of Rebellion;
1. Refusal to accept some authority or code or convention.
2. An act or show of defiance toward an authority or established government.
Defined meaning of Lawful;
1. Being within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint.
Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.
This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.
By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of our Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the following recourse;
1. Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful governance of this country.
2. Full refusal to abide by any Law, Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
3. To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.
Above are listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for. The British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that, to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.
The traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do, that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply up.
What does Magna Carta stand for?
In stands for freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one, without exception, is above the law.
Military and Homeland Security Dictate Who Lives And Who Dies In A Pandemic
A new report compiled by a medical “task force” comprising physicians from prestigious universities, medical groups, the military and government agencies has outlined that specific groups of people should not be treated and be left to die should a flu pandemic or other deadly disease disaster infect millions throughout the USA.
Doctors in the pay of federal government agencies including the Department of Homeland Security, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services have concluded that the already ill, the weak, the severely injured and the elderly will have to “forgo” life.
Jacqui Smith announces 300 new terror police
Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, today announced an extra 300 police officers to fight terrorism and radicalisation within communities.
Jacqui Smith
At the weekend Jacqui Smith warned that as many as 30 active plots against the UK were now being investigated
Miss Smith said that the new officers work to prevent young people being drawn into extremism.
The threat to Britain was “serious and growing” and, despite a series of successful raids and convictions, we cannot simply “arrest our way out” of the problem, she said.
“We need to prevent people from becoming terrorists and supporting terrorists in the first place,” she said.




